Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| courses:b4m36smu [2026/05/25 19:51] – [Symbolické strojové učení] jpelc | courses:b4m36smu [2026/05/27 09:37] (current) – [Other COLT] jpelc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
| % Layer Box | % Layer Box | ||
| - | \draw[thick, | + | \draw[thick, |
| - | \node at (4.5, 5) [font=\sffamily\bfseries\Large] {$\times N$ Layers}; | + | \node at (5.0, 7) [font=\sffamily\bfseries\Large] {$\times N$ Layers}; |
| \end{tikzpicture} | \end{tikzpicture} | ||
| Line 674: | Line 674: | ||
| \begin{tikzpicture}[ | \begin{tikzpicture}[ | ||
| > | > | ||
| - | % Added label styling | ||
| label_style/ | label_style/ | ||
| box/ | box/ | ||
| Line 700: | Line 699: | ||
| \node (h_next) at (12, 1) {$h_t$}; | \node (h_next) at (12, 1) {$h_t$}; | ||
| - | \draw[thick] (h_prev) -- (9.5, 1); | + | % Fixed: Stop the continuous line at the output gate (8.5) |
| + | \draw[thick] (h_prev) -- (8.5, 1); | ||
| \draw[->, | \draw[->, | ||
| Line 711: | Line 711: | ||
| \node[box] (g) at (6.5, 2.5) {$\tanh$}; | \node[box] (g) at (6.5, 2.5) {$\tanh$}; | ||
| - | % Candidate gate doesn' | ||
| \node[label_style, | \node[label_style, | ||
| Line 742: | Line 741: | ||
| % Final Hidden State routing | % Final Hidden State routing | ||
| \draw[->, | \draw[->, | ||
| - | \node[dot] at (9.5, 1) {}; | ||
| % Label | % Label | ||
| Line 838: | Line 836: | ||
| For $VC(\mathcal{H}) \geq n$: | For $VC(\mathcal{H}) \geq n$: | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| $\mathcal{I} \subseteq \left[1, 2, \dots n\right]$ | $\mathcal{I} \subseteq \left[1, 2, \dots n\right]$ | ||
| Line 1192: | Line 1190: | ||
| Latent Dirichlet allocation tries to discover hidden topics within a set of documents, by finding clusters of terms that tend to occur together. | Latent Dirichlet allocation tries to discover hidden topics within a set of documents, by finding clusters of terms that tend to occur together. | ||
| - | The model extracts these topics and infers the topic distribution $\thata$ for each document and the word distribution $\beta$ for each topic. | + | The model extracts these topics and infers the topic distribution $\theta$ for each document and the word distribution $\beta$ for each topic. |
| The document-topic distribution $\theta$ is modeled as a random variable $\theta \sim \text{Dirichlet}(\alpha)$ | The document-topic distribution $\theta$ is modeled as a random variable $\theta \sim \text{Dirichlet}(\alpha)$ | ||
| Line 1309: | Line 1307: | ||
| ++++ Adapt Winnow / Halving algorithm, define $\mathcal{H}$, | ++++ Adapt Winnow / Halving algorithm, define $\mathcal{H}$, | ||
| - | MB-learning (or online learning) is bounded by the number of mistakes which it can do while learning, that is $\leq \text{poly}(n)$. | + | M-B-learning (or online learning) is bounded by the number of mistakes which it can do while learning, that is $\leq \text{poly}(n)$. |
| $\mathcal{H}$ is the hypothesis class, with the individual hypotheses being functions $X\rightarrow \left\{0, 1\right\}$ The hypothesis class is the complete set of all hypotheses that a specific learner is capable of expressing. | $\mathcal{H}$ is the hypothesis class, with the individual hypotheses being functions $X\rightarrow \left\{0, 1\right\}$ The hypothesis class is the complete set of all hypotheses that a specific learner is capable of expressing. | ||
| Line 1345: | Line 1343: | ||
| Mistake bound learnability implies PAC-learnability. | Mistake bound learnability implies PAC-learnability. | ||
| - | MB learner with $M \lt \text{poly}(n)$ can be transformed into PAC learner by running it on a batch of training examples, stopping when a hypothesis successfully survives $\frac{1}{\epsilon}\text{ln}(\frac{M}{\delta})$ consecutive examples without making a mistake. | + | M-B learner with $M \lt \text{poly}(n)$ can be transformed into PAC learner by running it on a batch of training examples, stopping when a hypothesis successfully survives $\frac{1}{\epsilon}\text{ln}(\frac{M}{\delta})$ consecutive examples without making a mistake. |
| ++++ | ++++ | ||
| Line 1351: | Line 1349: | ||
| No. | No. | ||
| - | PAC-learnability does not guarantee | + | PAC-learnability does not guarantee |
| - | If a concept class is PAC-learnable, | + | If a concept class is PAC-learnable, |
| ++++ | ++++ | ||